tg-me.com/vangogh0/30538
Last Update:
BY فان جوخ
![](https://photo.tg-me.com/u/cdn4.cdn-telegram.org/file/ofHEAWVySStVivWFDhda4G89ed1qN1qiMpGv5YX95Q0YpIYPeWAyMc8jikVgvAKqStunAKEJd4Yk1FeaKM029kBxWPdq4nsLyl9C5yoxAmlJkQgK2f_s75a4EoXwL8u-gy258anIFr4HPTcvsdp7lfm4SoPgh4yP3LNAAUD2QqkgPDL1fRU2EyyP_o60pFSWBA2SYn6rpRuQw1BvKf7cYYTI_zeQ_StcJQk4LcoIAjPI_-2GwCq3oU-KcLHVwtwV9XxTRiy4Z3FGzM4Fo0zilYirkpYx3SZyVg2YNgrxd5JkIaQYHozMYtkjYTQT-pEvsp0M7deDjnH5kMm3pTRZ9g.jpg)
Share with your friend now:
tg-me.com/vangogh0/30538
BY فان جوخ
That strategy is the acquisition of a value-priced company by a growth company. Using the growth company's higher-priced stock for the acquisition can produce outsized revenue and earnings growth. Even better is the use of cash, particularly in a growth period when financial aggressiveness is accepted and even positively viewed.he key public rationale behind this strategy is synergy - the 1+1=3 view. In many cases, synergy does occur and is valuable. However, in other cases, particularly as the strategy gains popularity, it doesn't. Joining two different organizations, workforces and cultures is a challenge. Simply putting two separate organizations together necessarily creates disruptions and conflicts that can undermine both operations.
فان جوخ from jp